设为首页  |   加入收藏        
文章摘要
.Study on the Cooperation Ability and Research Subject in Evidence Mapping[J].中国药物评价,2019,36(3):165-168
证据图研究合作能力与研究主题分析
Study on the Cooperation Ability and Research Subject in Evidence Mapping
投稿时间:2019-04-09  修订日期:2019-04-09
DOI:
中文关键词: 证据图  研究主题  合作能力  VOSviewer软件  CiteSpace软件
英文关键词: Evidence mapping  Research topic  Cooperation ability  VOSviewer  CiteSpace
基金项目:甘肃省循证医学与临床转化重点实验室开放基金(项目编号:20170203;项目名称:循证医学方法学研究)
作者单位E-mail
高亚 兰州大学循证医学中心 463952814@qq.com 
李沐阳 兰州大学第二临床医学院  
孙月 兰州大学循证护理中心
兰州大学循证护理中心 
 
刘明 兰州大学循证医学中心  
施树珍 兰州大学循证医学中心  
张俊华 天津中医药大学循证医学中心  
田金徽 兰州大学循证医学中心  
摘要点击次数: 179
全文下载次数: 0
中文摘要:
      目的:对证据图研究进行文献计量学分析,以期了解目前证据图研究的现状并为学者开展相关研究提供借鉴和参考。方法:通过检索PubMed、EMBASE.com、Cochrane Library和 Web of Science获取证据图文献。利用VOSviewer 1.6.10软件对纳入研究的作者、国家、机构和关键词等信息进行提取,并对国家生成可视化合作网络图,对关键词进行聚类分析。采用CiteSpace V软件分析高产作者和高产机构之间的关系并生成可视化知识图谱。结果:共纳入证据图研究112篇,发文量最多的国家为美国(50篇),发文量最多的机构为塔夫茨大学(11篇),591位作者参与了证据图研究的发表,但发文量大于2篇的作者仅占4.74%。主要机构形成了3个研究团队,主要作者形成了6个合作团体,但各作者之间、机构之间合作较少。研究的主题主要有4个,主要的研究热点主题是肥胖、营养等人类的公共健康、婴幼儿的临床状况和青少年的心理健康。结论:高产的作者较少,参与研究的团体较多,各团体、机构之间的联系不够紧密,仍需进一步增强合作。证据图研究主题不多,仍需开拓新的研究主题。
英文摘要:
      Objective:To conduct bibliometric analysis of evidence mapping(EM) research, in order to explore the current status of EM and provide reference for scholars to carry out related research. Methods: EMs were obtained by searching PubMed, EMBASE.com, Cochrane Library and Web of Science. Using VOSviewer 1.6.10 software to extract the authors, countries, institutions and keywords, and generate visual cooperation network maps for the country, perform cluster analysis for keywords. CiteSpace V software was used to analyze the relationship between high-yield authors and high-yield institutions and to generate a visual knowledge map. Results: A total of 112 EMs were included, the countries with the largest number of publications is the United States (50papers), the institutions with the largest number of publications is Tufts University (11papers), and 591 authors participated in the publication of the evidence map research, but the authors with more than 2 papers accounted for only 4.74%. The main institutions formed three research teams, and the main authors formed six cooperative groups, but there was less cooperation among the authors and institutions. There are four main themes of research. The main research topics are the public health of human beings such as obesity and nutrition, the clinical status of infants and young children, and the mental health of adolescents. Conclusion: There are fewer high-yielding authors, more participating groups, and insufficient cooperation between groups and institutions. Further cooperation is needed. There are not many research topics, and new research topics still need to be developed.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭
function PdfOpen(url){ var win="toolbar=no,location=no,directories=no,status=yes,menubar=yes,scrollbars=yes,resizable=yes"; window.open(url,"",win); } function openWin(url,w,h){ var win="toolbar=no,location=no,directories=no,status=no,menubar=no,scrollbars=yes,resizable=no,width=" + w + ",height=" + h; controlWindow=window.open(url,"",win); } &et=08EE5A5866ACE4408257D06263E0600ED2D49CD3C61441CA19C2CBB483C76400781B241188CA4BB24DAF5F8D45FD79236B5EC56B3B81F0E7588B9EA736A6BC22A8986A333A06E8805FB591A7B4EE1A5E&pcid=A9DB1C13C87CE289EA38239A9433C9DC&cid=C67D2F8D2B6D9BA9&jid=7E2D005B9876DF2C49428C8EADF4A462&yid=B6351343F4791CA3&aid=&vid=&iid=38B194292C032A66&sid=31611641D4BB139F&eid=BBF7D98F9BEDEC74&fileno=2019069&flag=1&is_more=0">